Compact Freezers · head to head
GOFLAME 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 58090RRE0
The GOFLAME 3.2 cu ft and the Antarctic Star 58090RRE0 are both compact freezers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceGOFLAME — GOFLAME is $20 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosGOFLAME — GOFLAME has more real photos to inspect (8 vs 7).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | GOFLAME | Antarctic Star |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Freezers | Compact Freezers |
| Model | — | 58090RRE0 |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
| Dimensions | 17.5" W × 19" H × 32" D | — |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Black | Black |
| Price |
Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the GOFLAME 3.2 cu ft or the Antarctic Star 58090RRE0?
The GOFLAME 3.2 cu ft wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the Antarctic Star 58090RRE0 wins matters more to you.
Is the GOFLAME 3.2 cu ft or the Antarctic Star 58090RRE0 cheaper?
GOFLAME is $20 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the GOFLAME 3.2 cu ft or the Antarctic Star 58090RRE0?
Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More compact freezers comparisons
- GOFLAME 3.2 cu ft vs ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju →
- GOFLAME 3.2 cu ft vs ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft →
- GOFLAME 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 58087RRE0-STEEL →
- ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju vs Antarctic Star 58090RRE0 →
- ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 58090RRE0 →
- Anukis FLS-80-slliver vs Antarctic Star 58090RRE0 →