Compact Freezers · head to head
Emerson CR0232W vs ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft
The Emerson CR0232W and the ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft are both compact freezers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceEmerson — Emerson is $33 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosActiveTrail — ActiveTrail has more real photos to inspect (8 vs 4).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | Emerson | ActiveTrail |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Freezers | Compact Freezers |
| Model | CR0232W | — |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
| Dimensions | 18.9" W × 19.7" H × 33.5" D | — |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | White | — |
| Price |
Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the Emerson CR0232W or the ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft?
The Emerson CR0232W wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft wins matters more to you.
Is the Emerson CR0232W or the ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft cheaper?
Emerson is $33 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the Emerson CR0232W or the ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft?
Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More compact freezers comparisons
- Emerson CR0232W vs ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju →
- Emerson CR0232W vs Antarctic Star 58087RRE0-STEEL →
- ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 58087RRE0-STEEL →
- ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 58090RRE0 →
- ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 58090RRE0-S →
- Emerson CR0232W vs Antarctic Star 58090RRE0 →