Upright Freezers · head to head
COSTWAY 3 cu ft vs ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300
The COSTWAY 3 cu ft and the ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300 are both upright freezers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
Our pick
Our pick: the COSTWAY 3 cu ft
COSTWAY gives you more space for your money — $85 vs $100 per cu ft.
The ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300 does not lead on any measured spec here.
At a glance
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | COSTWAY | ARCTIC CHEF |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Upright Freezers | Upright Freezers |
| Model | — | RFRF300 |
| Capacity | 3 cu ft | 3 cu ft |
| Dimensions | 20" W × 31" H × 20.5" D | 23" W × 22" H × 33" D |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Stainless Steel | White |
| Price |
Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the COSTWAY 3 cu ft or the ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300?
Our pick: the COSTWAY 3 cu ft. COSTWAY gives you more space for your money — $85 vs $100 per cu ft. The ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300 does not lead on any measured spec here.
Is the COSTWAY 3 cu ft or the ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300 cheaper?
COSTWAY is $46 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the COSTWAY 3 cu ft or the ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300?
Both hold about 3 cu ft.
Which gives more freezer space per dollar, the COSTWAY 3 cu ft or the ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300?
COSTWAY gives you more space for your money — $85 vs $100 per cu ft.
Which takes up less floor space, the COSTWAY 3 cu ft or the ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300?
COSTWAY takes up less floor space — 410 vs 759 sq in.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more