Upright Freezers · head to head
COSTWAY 3 cu ft vs ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300
The COSTWAY 3 cu ft and the ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300 are both upright freezers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceCOSTWAY — COSTWAY is $46 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3 cu ft.
More product photosCOSTWAY — COSTWAY has more real photos to inspect (9 vs 2).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | COSTWAY | ARCTIC CHEF |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Upright Freezers | Upright Freezers |
| Model | — | RFRF300 |
| Capacity | 3 cu ft | 3 cu ft |
| Dimensions | 20" W × 31" H × 20.5" D | 23" W × 22" H × 33" D |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Stainless Steel | White |
| Price |
Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the COSTWAY 3 cu ft or the ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300?
The COSTWAY 3 cu ft wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300 wins matters more to you.
Is the COSTWAY 3 cu ft or the ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300 cheaper?
COSTWAY is $46 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the COSTWAY 3 cu ft or the ARCTIC CHEF RFRF300?
Both hold about 3 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more