Compact Freezers · head to head
Sweetcrispy SMBXBK1 vs Antarctic Star 5887
The Sweetcrispy SMBXBK1 and the Antarctic Star 5887 are both compact freezers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceSweetcrispy — Sweetcrispy is $30 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | Sweetcrispy | Antarctic Star |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Freezers | Compact Freezers |
| Model | SMBXBK1 | 5887 |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
| Dimensions | — | — |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Black | White |
| Price |
Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the Sweetcrispy SMBXBK1 or the Antarctic Star 5887?
The Sweetcrispy SMBXBK1 wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the Antarctic Star 5887 wins matters more to you.
Is the Sweetcrispy SMBXBK1 or the Antarctic Star 5887 cheaper?
Sweetcrispy is $30 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the Sweetcrispy SMBXBK1 or the Antarctic Star 5887?
Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More compact freezers comparisons
- ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju vs Sweetcrispy SMBXBK1 →
- Sweetcrispy SMBXBK1 vs ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft →
- Sweetcrispy SMBXBK1 vs Antarctic Star 58087RRE0-STEEL →
- ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju vs Antarctic Star 5887 →
- ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 5887 →
- Anukis FLS-80-slliver vs Antarctic Star 5887 →