Compact Freezers · head to head
Electactic 58090RRE0-STEEL vs Antarctic Star 5887
The Electactic 58090RRE0-STEEL and the Antarctic Star 5887 are both compact freezers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceElectactic — Electactic is $40 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosAntarctic Star — Antarctic Star has more real photos to inspect (7 vs 5).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | Electactic | Antarctic Star |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Freezers | Compact Freezers |
| Model | 58090RRE0-STEEL | 5887 |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
| Dimensions | — | — |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | — | White |
| Price |
Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the Electactic 58090RRE0-STEEL or the Antarctic Star 5887?
The Electactic 58090RRE0-STEEL wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the Antarctic Star 5887 wins matters more to you.
Is the Electactic 58090RRE0-STEEL or the Antarctic Star 5887 cheaper?
Electactic is $40 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the Electactic 58090RRE0-STEEL or the Antarctic Star 5887?
Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More compact freezers comparisons
- Electactic 58090RRE0-STEEL vs ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju →
- Electactic 58090RRE0-STEEL vs ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft →
- Electactic 58090RRE0-STEEL vs Antarctic Star 58087RRE0-STEEL →
- ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju vs Antarctic Star 5887 →
- ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star 5887 →
- Anukis FLS-80-slliver vs Antarctic Star 5887 →