Compact Freezers · head to head
COSTWAY 22680BK-CYPE vs Antarctic Star BCD-87
The COSTWAY 22680BK-CYPE and the Antarctic Star BCD-87 are both compact freezers in the same size and price class. Below is a side-by-side of their real capacity, dimensions, energy use, and current prices so you can pick the one that fits your space and budget — no invented ratings, just the specs and live pricing.
At a glance
Lower priceCOSTWAY — COSTWAY is $30 cheaper at last check.
More capacityTie — Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
More product photosCOSTWAY — COSTWAY has more real photos to inspect (8 vs 7).
Specifications, side by side
| Spec | COSTWAY | Antarctic Star |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Compact Freezers | Compact Freezers |
| Model | 22680BK-CYPE | BCD-87 |
| Capacity | 3.2 cu ft | 3.2 cu ft |
| Dimensions | — | — |
| Energy use | — | — |
| Color | Black | Silver |
| Price |
Prices re-checked on a schedule; tap a price for the live number at the retailer.
Frequently asked
Which should you buy, the COSTWAY 22680BK-CYPE or the Antarctic Star BCD-87?
The COSTWAY 22680BK-CYPE wins on 1 of the 1 measurable factors (lower price). Choose it unless a spec the Antarctic Star BCD-87 wins matters more to you.
Is the COSTWAY 22680BK-CYPE or the Antarctic Star BCD-87 cheaper?
COSTWAY is $30 cheaper at last check.
Which holds more, the COSTWAY 22680BK-CYPE or the Antarctic Star BCD-87?
Both hold about 3.2 cu ft.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Learn more
More compact freezers comparisons
- ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju vs COSTWAY 22680BK-CYPE →
- COSTWAY 22680BK-CYPE vs ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft →
- COSTWAY 22680BK-CYPE vs Antarctic Star 58087RRE0-STEEL →
- ActiveTrail bS4-zZVr-fKZV2x-3TiKr7Oju vs Antarctic Star BCD-87 →
- ActiveTrail 3.2 cu ft vs Antarctic Star BCD-87 →
- Anukis FLS-80-slliver vs Antarctic Star BCD-87 →